Wednesday, December 17, 2008
Friday, December 12, 2008
Nationalization of our largest manufacturing infrastructure? Check
Nationalization of a large chunk of the insurance industry? Check
Worst part? It's all happened while a so-called Republican was in the White House
Nationalization of our health care? On the agenda of the next administration
Nationalization of our educational system? Some could definitely argue, Check. Either way, further controls are on the agenda thanks to the Obamessiah's beholden nature to the unions
Someone want to argue that we're not going to be a socialist country in 4 years? Anyone?
Tuesday, December 02, 2008
The posting below was something I wrote on a normally conservative website that was holding Walmart responsible for the trampling on Long Island on "Black Friday". The poster basically stated that Walmart was responsible and even if the police were able to identify some of the animals (my word, not theirs) who perpetrated this crime, no charges should be filed:
Good God, the majority of you sound like the ambulance-chasing, corporate-hating, responsibility-eschewing left wing that some of you SAY you hate.
Perhaps we should assign some personal responsibility to the animals who stampeded this poor man. The folks who led the charge, who didn’t have any sort of honor, who were only looking out for themselves.
300,000,000 people in the country. 4,100 Walmart facilities. A large number of them participated in “Black Friday” sales, and only one person was trampled by a mob of unruly animals, at one Walmart.
How is it that the people at the other 4,099 Walmart stores seemed to be able to handle themselves as civilized human beings?
Hold people to a standard and they’ll surprise you. Hold them to the lowest common denominator and they’ll disappoint you.
Monday, November 24, 2008
The Obamessiah wants to fix public schools so that your kids can actually learn a thing or two as well as be somewhat safe in them. And he even said that "we need to fix our public schools, not just throw up our hands and walk away from them".
Yet, his hands are in the air, waving around like he just don't care....as he sends his kids to ..wait for it.....wait for it.....wait for it....
Yep. Do as I say, not as I do. Public schools are good enough for you, just not for me.
Friday, November 21, 2008
That all having been said, I think that the treatment of the Big 3 CEO's by congress this week is deplorable. Let's think about this for a second:
1. "Come back with a business plan and we'll take a look and decide whether we'll loan you the money" -- Really? Since when has congress ever given a rat's ass about 'business plans'? And how many of them would actually recognize a business plan if it hit them right square between the eyes? Was AIG required to present a business plan when they got their $$? Nope. How about PNC when they got their money and then turned around and used it to NOT take care of bad assets, but instead buy National City bank? No, they weren't either. Screw you ignorant congresscum and your hypocrisy.
2. "I can't believe you flew here on a private jet to ask for money" -- Wait? Someone who has lived suckling to the government tit for the last 20-something years, flying private jets either at the taxpayers expense or some lobbyists is questioning the use of a corporate owned jet when it allows the CEO the opportunity to stay in the office until the last possible minute and get immediately back to work, all the while doing work ON the jet? I've done the private charter thing before and it's great. You leave when you're ready and when your work is done. You can work on the plane, stretch out and get things done, AND you can take phone calls and be generally productive especially when dealing with extremely sensitive subjects, like oh, the saving of your entire industry.
3. "Are you willing to work for no salary or a symbolic salary until your company gets turned around?" -- This one is almost laughable. First, when have you EVER heard a congressman offer that (other than Ron Paul, who didn't offer to take only a dollar, but has a greately reduced office budget)? A congressman who offers to take only a dollar for his salary would be an honest one to ask that question. Any of the others should shut the hell up until they stop living on the taxpayer's dime.
I'm not necessarily for a bailout of the auto industry, but I am not nearly as against it as I was against the one for the financial industry. I see the bailout of the auto industry one as one that actually may be necessary to save jobs as opposed to provide the Treasury Secretary's friends with the money to save their individual companies. If it happens, there needs to be strings attached, such as quick payback terms, restrictions on moving jobs to non-US plants, and others.
If congress doesn't bail out the companies, I'm hoping that all their talk about bankruptcy is just bluster. Because if it's not, the effects on the economy of a GM bankruptcy will make the bad news of the last 4 months look like a walk in the park.
Thursday, November 20, 2008
I mean seriously, wtf?
Would these peace, love, and dope types would have posted this same thing had McCain won?
They certainly didn't when Bush won.
Monday, November 17, 2008
Well, apparently the lies continue, as the Obamessiah has hired several to take pretty prominent places in the 'transition' team. Not only are the ones that he had as part of his campaign still hanging around, but he's hired more than a dozen people who either are still licensed lobbyists or who VERY recently were.
Mark Gitenstein - lobbied for U.S. Chamber of Commerce and promoted legislation for Boeing and General Dynamics. He also has lobbied for KPMG (Good luck getting a simplified tax code when the accountants have any say), Ernst & Young, Merrill Lynch, and AT&T.
Ron Klain - lobbied for Fannie Mae (gee...shocker there), and represented a company that was facing asbestos exposure claims against them(so much for looking out for the working man), U.S. Airways, and IMClone
Patrick Gaspard - lobbied for the SEIU on behalf of health care issues. Nope, no worries there that union bosses won't take away the right to have confidential votes for unionization.
And of course, let us not forget John Podesta, who heads up the entire transition team. Not only has this retread from the Clinton Administration been a lobbyist for the last eight years, but when Bill Clinton put into place a five year ban on people leaving the employment of the federal government and joining lobbying firms, as soon as George W. Bush won the 2000 election, John Podesta helped Clinton write an order rescinding that ban to allow soon-to-be displaced Dimwitocrat staffers to find jobs.....
Go figure. If you want to read more, go to Hotair as they've done a pretty good job of researching it as well.
The more things CHANGE, the more they stay the same.
Friday, November 07, 2008
Oh there will be programs on top of programs. And you wanted them. At least, 52% of you wanted them anyway. And none of you will have to pay for them. Some nebulus rich people will pay for it, because that's the fair way of doing it. Only rich people should have to pay for these programs because they're taking more than their "fair" share and they're obviously under the mistaken notion that just because they worked for their wealth that they should be allowed to keep it. Nope, that's not fair. Redistribution of the wealth, now THAT'S fair.
I'd just like to thank the people who ran the McCain campaign and John McCain himself for not stepping to the plate when it came right down to it and ensuring that a competent campaign was actually put up against Mr. HopeandChange. Had a competent campain been put together where the opponent was shown to be a liberal and that sort of thing wasn't left to talk radio to expose, as well as ensuring that Reverend Wrong's messages of hatred from the left would have been played upon and Mr. HopeandChange's consistent lies about what he knew and who he knew were exposed, we may not have all that hope to look forward to.
Gosh, I just HOPE that the taxpayers (all 1% of them) of this country can actually afford all that CHANGE.
Wednesday, November 05, 2008
Now that we're done with the election and the legacy of President Bush is to be considered, an article in the Wall Street Journal caught my attention and honestly, is spot on. Rather than try to pick through it, I'll just quote it in its entirety and link to it for proper attribution.
While I have not always agreed with President Bush, I truly agree that his efforts have always been in what he felt was the best interests of the country and not in an effort to create a legacy, unlike his immediate predecessor. Godspeed President Bush and may history treat you better than America has over the last eight years.
Earlier this year, 12,000 people in San Francisco signed a petition in support of a proposition on a local ballot to rename an Oceanside sewage plant after George W. Bush. The proposition is only one example of the classless disrespect many Americans have shown the president. According to recent Gallup polls, the president's average approval rating is below 30% -- down from his 90%
approval in the wake of 9/11. Mr. Bush has endured relentless attacks from the left while facing abandonment from the right.
This is the price Mr. Bush is paying for trying to work with both Democrats and Republicans. During his 2004 victory speech, the president reached out to voters who supported his opponent, John Kerry, and said, "Today, I want to speak to every person who voted for my
opponent. To make this nation stronger and better, I will need your support, and I will work to earn it. I will do all I can do to deserve your trust." Those bipartisan efforts have been met with crushing resistance from both political parties.
The president's original Supreme Court choice of Harriet Miers alarmed Republicans, while his final nomination of Samuel Alito angered Democrats. His solutions to reform the immigration system alienated traditional conservatives, while his refusal to retreat in Iraq has enraged liberals who have unrealistic expectations about the challenges we face there. It seems
that no matter what Mr. Bush does, he is blamed for everything. He remains despised by the left while continuously disappointing the right. Yet it should seem obvious that many of our country's current problems either existed long before Mr. Bush ever came to office, or are beyond his control. Perhaps if Americans stopped being so divisive, and congressional leaders came together to work with the president on some of these problems, he would actually have had a fighting chance of solving them.
Like the president said in his 2004 victory speech, "We have one country, one Constitution and one future that binds us. And when we come together and work together, there is no limit to the greatness of America." To be sure, Mr. Bush is not completely alone. His low approval ratings put him in the good company of former Democratic President Harry S. Truman, whose own approval rating sank to 22% shortly before he left office. Despite Mr. Truman's low numbers, a 2005 Wall Street Journal poll found that he was ranked the seventh most popular president in history.
Just as Americans have gained perspective on how challenging Truman's presidency was in the wake of World War II, our country will recognize the hardship President Bush faced these past eight years -- and how extraordinary it was that he accomplished what he did in the wake of the September 11 attacks.
The treatment President Bush has received from this country is nothing less than a disgrace. The attacks launched against him have been cruel and slanderous, proving to the world what little character and resolve we have. The president is not to blame for all these problems. He never lost faith in America or her people, and has tried his hardest to continue leading our nation during a very difficult time. Our failure to stand by the one person who continued to stand by us has not gone unnoticed by our enemies. It has shown to the world how disloyal we can be when our president needed loyalty -- a shameful display of arrogance and weakness that will haunt this nation long after Mr. Bush has left the White House. WSG-11/05/08
Tuesday, November 04, 2008
Now my question is, it's Philadephia and it's a public housing facility, it's a Dimwitocrat stronghold, why the heck post a Black Panther guard there to ensure no funny-business happens? It seems if they have any sense (yes, I know, assuming a lot there) that they'd go out in the suburbs and stand in front of an elementary school, because it's in places like that where if you were an idiot conspiracy theorist, you'd think the Republicans would stuff the ballot boxes. In places like Philly, only the Dimwitocrats do the stuffing since there ARE NO Republicans.
Monday, November 03, 2008
1. The Obamessiah is a 'rock-star'. No joke. He draws screaming fans who I certainly think that believe if he laid his hands upon them, they would be healed. The people who support him are mindless automatons who chant his name and would crawl over broken glass to touch a cigarette that may have touched his lips (you didn't know he smoked? Yeah, that leads to #2).
2. Complete disregard for any journalistic integrity. Major media outlets such as NBC are so far in the tank for The Obamessiah that some people are actually noticing, outside of the conservatives and Republicans. From Chris Matthews with his "chill in my legs" to Brian Williams, gushing over him about his first Newsweek cover, there has been zero journalistic integrity when covering the Obamessiah. Sarah Palin tries to get a state trooper fired who tasered his son, abused his authority, went to work under the influence, and generally was a bad cop, but happened to be her ex-brother in law and she is crucified. The Obamessiah hangs out with terrorists and supporters of terrorists and we're told "Oh, there's no story there". Which leads to point #3.
3. The American people, for all their optimism and all their goodness, tend to be idiots. Yes, you heard me, y'all are friggin morons, choosing to be led around through that ring in your nose by pop culture, media icons, and mob mentality. The rich are evil? Really? Make sure you tell Bill Gates that next time he donates the equivalent of the GDP of a small country to wiping out malaria in Africa. Corporations are evil? Oh really? If so, then I'm sure you won't mind donating that paycheck that you get from that evil corporation to help Mr. Gates wipe out malaria in Africa. It's the least you could do, after all. Wouldn't want to take blood money, right?
How is it that people who run legitimate businesses are targets for tax increases and made out to be selfish, unpatriotic, asses if they don't want to pay more taxes to support those who weren't willing to take a chance and start a company that creates jobs? Why is it that the people who ARE the backbone of America, the entrepreneurs and business owners are being made out to be the evil ones? Because the American people don't stand up and say "fuck you NY Times, this guy pays my bills with his corporation and I appreciate that". No, we're the folks who just nod and think to ourselves "yeah..son of a bitch should pay more in taxes".
I heard an advertisement on the radio that truly made my blood boil on Saturday. There is a guy running for State Senate named Chase Bulger (not sure if I spelled that right, but his name doesn't really matter, I just figured I'd give him a shout-out). He started an accounts receivable company, created jobs, and provided a service to other companies. A legal service. Yet the advertisement that his opponent had said "He makes his money off the backs of working people" and "You mean when I get a little behind in my bills, he's that guy that calls me?". I almost drove off the road I was so livid. Demonizing a guy for owning a legitimate company, that provides a legitimate service allowing other companies to help their cash flow issues is not only unethical, it's ridiculous. Additionally, he doesn't make his living off 'working people', he makes his living off deadbeat assholes that don't pay their bills. Are we just supposed to forgive those bills and let people walk away from their debts? Oh yeah, we are talking about a Dimwitocrat here, so I suppose so.
But yet, the American people accept this predigested pablum into their daily diet of advertising as God's honest truth. "That Republican must hate working people because he owns a collection company"...really? are you stupid or just merely not paying attention? Speaking of stupid....
4. Lies, damn lies, and politics. Right out of the gate, The Obamessiah broke a huge campaign promise. He said he'd take the public funding for his campaign. That would have given him a much smaller budget than the estimated $600 million he currently has, donated to him by huge donors. When the media (see #2) tells you that the majority of his donors were small donors under $100, know that's a lie.
5. The war. Yes, remember, that little conflict that's going in Iraq and in Afghanistan that was conveniently forgotten by the media when suddenly it started going well for us and they could no longer throw blood on the hands of the Republicans and President Bush. While Senator McCain's position on the surge can very well be credited for this success, the fact that it's not #1 in the minds of American's any longer belie the reasons why he's not getting credit for it.
6. Worldwide respect. While this isn't something that most Americans give a hill of beans about, there are those who look across the Atlantic and long for the approval of our buddies in the EU. "President Bush has ruined our reputation worldwide and sullied our image" say the whiners who see the Obamessiah as someone who will be loved on the world stage.
Perhaps, but ask yourself: Would you rather be popular or right? Would you rather be respected or feared?
Myself, I'd rather have the US be feared on the world stage. If we're respected because of our largesse, great, but I want those guys who would do evil to know that if they try it on us, we will retaliate with the full force of a nation of pissed off individuals.
I guess the nice part about all this is that I write much better when I'm pissed, and I can already foresee that I'm going to be pissed for at least the next two years, probably the next four. Stay optimistic guys and if you are going to vote for McCain, Bob Barr or Chuck Baldwin, please make sure and vote. Those of you who are stupid enough to vote for Obama, go back to playing Xbox. You don't deserve to breathe, let alone vote.
Friday, October 31, 2008
Thursday, October 30, 2008
No. Not only no, but f___ no. No f-ing way in a million years.
Let's see, why would he not get a security clearance?
1. Drug history - My personal history of drug use (yes, your man here has experimented with some mind altering stuff....serious mind altering stuff) provided a sufficient reason to not allow me to get anything higher than a secret clearance. Everything else in my background was clear, but because I dabbled, no go. Given Obamessiah's history of cocaine use, Secret would be as high as he'd get. However, let's keep going....
2. Friends and affiliates - While some of my friends are crazy sonsabitches (yes, I'm talking about you, Ken, Josh, Ted, Jason, Mike, Tom, Dan, et al), they wouldn't disqualify me from getting a security clearance. In fact, Dr. Ken works for frickin NASA, Josh works for a governmental agency that until the last few years, no one knew existed, Mike was Navy, and Jason & Ted are former AF with mucho clearance. Just cuz they're crazy doesn't mean they're not secure. Obamessiah on the other hand has CLOSE associations with domestic terrorist, Bill Ayers (yes, I know, he was a terrorist when Obamessiah was 8, but he's unapologetic and states to this day that he didn't do enough damage), as well as a PLO leader and spokesman, Rashid Khalidi. That's enough to disqualify him for anything, but there's more.
3. His wife - Michelle Obama has regularly discussed her dislike of America and her shame of America. Additionally, her dissertation at Princeton focused on blacks in America and how any successful blacks who integrated themselves into society were 'too white'. While there's nothing against the law here, it goes to general attitude.
If a guy can't get a security clearance as a private citizen, should we really put him in charge of the nuclear codes? Really?
For anyone who doesn't know, the Huffington Post is a far left wing blog site that tends to resemble DailyKos more than anything intelligent. No, I'm not linking to either. If you're dumb enough to want to go to these sites, type the damn thing yourself.
The most amusing part of the whole thing is that the murdering liberal stabbed her ex-lover 222 times with a phillips head screw driver but took her own life with a gun. So, obviously she wanted her ex-lover to die slowly and painfully but didn't have the balls to face justice or kill herself the same slow painful method (bleeding to death).
Remember, screwdrivers don't kill people, liberals kill people.
Wednesday, October 29, 2008
And how do we know this?
Because an Obamessiah supporter who happened to be the director of the Ohio Department of Job and Family Services, Helen Jones-Kelley, ok'd the search into Wurzelbacher's background. OUTRAGEOUS, you say?! Nope. According to the governor of Ohio, completely above-board and in no violation of any rule they have. And yes, if you haven't already guessed it, he's a huge Obamessiah disciple as well. He says that it's perfectly fine to do a background check on someone who is thrust into the public limelight like Joe had been.
Of course, they're still investigating why it is that department of motor vehicles information was pulled. I figure that investigation will complete shortly after the election and will find no wrong-doing whatsoever of course.
And it'll only get worse. Disagree with the Obamessiah and risk being labelled a racist. Disagree with the liberals and risk having every skeleton that you may have in your closet exposed for all to see. Anyone who disagrees with them can plan on being ripped to shreds in the media, by pundits, and by anyone who wants to parrot the company line.
I can already see my driver's license information getting posted......
Tuesday, October 28, 2008
To Barack Hussein Obama,
The New York Times carried a story on Saturday, October 4, 2008, that proved you had a significantly closer relationship with Bill Ayers than what you previously admitted. While the issue of your relationship is of concern, the greater concern is that you lied to America about it.
The Chicago Sun reported on May 8, 2008, that FBI records showed that you had a significantly closer relationship with Tony Rezko than what you previously admitted. In the interview, you said that you only saw Mr. Rezko a couple of times a year. The FBI files showed that you saw him weekly. While the issue of your relationship is of concern, the greater concern is that you lied to America about it.
Your speech in Philadelphia on March 18, 2008, about "race" contradicted your statement to Anderson Cooper on March 14 when you said that you never heard Reverend Wright make his negative statements about white America . While your attendance at Trinity Church for 20 years is of concern, the greater concern is that you lied to America on March 14.
In your 1st debate with John McCain, you said that you never said that you would meet with the leaders of Cuba, Venezuela, Iran, and North Korea without "preparations" at lower levels ... Joe Biden repeated your words in his debate with Sarah Palin ... while the video tape from your debate last February clearly shows that you answered "I would" to the question of meeting with those leaders within 12 months without "any" preconditions. While your judgement about meeting with enemies of the USA without pre-conditions is of concern, the greater concern is that you lied to America in the debate with McCain.
On July 14, 2008, you said that you always knew that the surge would work while the video tapes of you from more than a year ago show that you stated that the surge would not work. While your judgement about military strategy as a potential commander-in-chief is of concern, the greater concern is that you lied to America on July 14.
You now claim that your reason for voting against funding for the troops was because the bill did not include a time line for withdrawal, while the video tapes of you from more than a year ago show that you voted against additional funding because you wanted our troops to be removed immediately ... not in 16 months after the 2008 election as you now claim. While your judgement about removing our troops unilaterally in 2007 is of concern, the greater concern is that you lied to America about your previous position.
You claim to have a record of working with Republicans while the record shows that the only bill that you sponsored with a Republican was with Chuck Lugar ... and it failed. The record shows that you vote 97% in concert with the Democrat party and that you have the most liberal voting record in the Senate. You joined Republicans only 13% of the time in your votes and those 13% were only after agreement from the Democrat party. While it is of concern that you fail to include conservatives in your actions and that you are such a liberal, the greater concern is that you distorted the truth.
In the primary debates of last February, 2008, you claimed to have talked with a "Captain" of a platoon in Afghanistan "the other day" when in fact you had a discussion in 2003 with a Lieutenant who had just been deployed to Afghanistan . You lied in that debate.
In your debates last spring, you claimed to have been a "professor of Constitutional law" when in fact you have never been a professor of Constitutional law. In this last debate, you were careful to say that you "taught a law class" and never mentioned being a "professor of Constitutional law." You lied last spring.
You and Joe Biden both claimed that John McCain voted against additional funding for our troops when the actual records show the opposite. You distorted the truth.
You and Joe Biden claim that John McCain voted against funding for alternate energy sources 20 times when the record shows that John McCain specifically voted against funding for bio fuels, especially corn ... and he was right .... corn is too expensive at producing ethanol, and using corn to make ethanol increased the price of corn from $2 a bushel to $6 a bushel for food. You distorted the truth.
You and Joe Biden claim that John McCain voted like both of you for a tax increase on those making as little as $42,000 per year while the voting record clearly shows that John McCain did not vote as you and Joe Biden. You lied to America .
You and Joe Biden claim that John McCain voted with George W. Bush 90% of the time when you know that Democrats also vote 90% of the time with the President (including Joe Biden) because the vast majority of the votes are procedural. You are one of the few who has not voted 90% of the time with the president because you have been missing from the Senate since the day you got elected. While your absence from your job in the Senate is of concern, the greater concern is that you spin the facts.
You did not take an active role in the rescue plan. You claimed that the Senate did not need you while the real reason that you abstained was because of your close relationships with the executives of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Countrywide, and Acorn ... who all helped cause the financial problems of today ... and they all made major contributions to your campaign. While your relationship with these executives and your protection of them for your brief 3 years in the Senate (along with Barney Frank, Chuck Schumer, Maxine Waters, and Chris Dodd) is of concern, the greater concern is that you are being deceitful.
You forgot to mention that you personally represented Tony Rezko and Acorn. Tony Rezko, an Arab and close friend to you, was convicted of fraud in Chicago real estate transactions that bilked millions of tax dollars from the Illinois government for renovation projects that you sponsored as a state senator ... and Acorn has been convicted of voter fraud, real estate sub prime loan intimidation, and illegal campaign contributions. Tony Rezko has contributed hundreds of thousands of dollars to your political campaigns. You personally used your political positions to steer money to both Tony Rezko and Acorn and you used Acorn to register thousands of phony voters for Democrats and you. While your relationships with Rezko and Acorn are of concern, the greater concern is that you omitted important facts about your relationships with them to America .
During your campaign, you said: "typical white person." "They cling to their guns and religion." "They will say that I am black." You played the race card. You tried to label any criticism about you as racist. You divide America .
You claim that you will reduce taxes for 95% of America , but you forgot to tell America that those reductions are after you remove the Bush tax reductions. You have requested close to $1 billion in earmarks and several million for Acorn. Your social programs will cost America $1 trillion per year and you claim that a reduction in military spending ($100 billion for Iraq ) can pay for it. While your economic plan of adding 30% to the size of our federal government is of concern, the greater concern is that you are deceiving America .
The drain to America 's economy by foreign supplied oil is $700 billion per year (5% of GDP) while the war in Iraq is $100 billion (less than 1% of GDP). You voted against any increases to oil exploration for the last 3 years and any expansion of nuclear facilities. Yet today, you say that you have always been for more oil and more nuclear. You are lying to America .
Mr. Obama, you claimed that you "changed" your mind about public financing for your campaign because of the money spent by Republican PACs in 2004. The truth is that the Democrat PACs in 2004, 2006, and 2008 spent twice as much as the Republican PACs (especially George Soros and MoveOn.org). You are lying to America .
Mr. Obama, you have done nothing to stop the actions of the teachers union and college professors in the USA . They eliminated religion from our history. They teach pro gay agendas and discuss sex with students as young as first grade. They bring their personal politics into the classrooms. They disparage conservatives. They brainwash our children. They are in it for themselves ..... not America . Are you reluctant to condemn their actions because teachers/professors and the NEA contribute 25% of all money donated to Democrats and none to Republicans? You are deceiving America .
Oh, Mr. Obama, Teddy Roosevelt said about a hundred years ago that we Americans should first look at the character of our leaders before anything else.
Your character looks horrible. While you make good speeches, motivating speeches, your character does not match your rhetoric. You talk the talk, but do not walk the walk.
1. You lied to America . You lied many times. You distorted facts. You parsed your answers like a lawyer.
2. You distorted the record of John McCain in your words and in your advertisements.
3. You had associations with some very bad people for your personal political gains and then lied about those associations.
4. You divide America about race and about class.
Now let me compare your record of lies, distortions, race baiting, and associations to John McCain: War hero. Annapolis graduate with "Country first." Operational leadership experience like all 43 previously elected presidents of the USA as a Navy officer for 22 years. 26 years in the Senate. Straight talk. Maverick. 54% of the time participated on bills with Democrats. Never asked for an earmark. The only blemish on his record is his part in the Keating 5 debacle about 25 years ago.
Mr. Obama, at Harvard Law School, you learned that the end does not justify the means. You learned that perjury, false witness, dishonesty, distortion of truth are never tolerated. Yet, your dishonesty is overwhelming. Your dishonesty is tremendously greater than the dishonesty that caused the impeachment and disbarment of Bill Clinton. Your dishonesty is tremendously greater than the dishonesty of Scooter Libby. You should be ashamed.
Mr. Obama, it is time for us Americans to put aside our differences on political issues and vote against you because of your dishonest character. It is time for all of us Americans to put aside our political issues and vote for America first. It is time for America to vote for honesty.
Any people who vote for you after understanding that you are dishonest should be ashamed of themselves for making their personal political issues more important than character. Would these same people vote for the anti-Christ if the anti-Christ promised them riches? Would they make a golden calf while Moses was up the mountain? Would they hire someone for a job if that someone lied in an interview? Of course not. So why do some of these people justify their votes for you even though they know you are dishonest? Why do they excuse your dishonesty? Because some of these people are frightened about the future, the economy, and their financial security .... and you are preying on their fears with empty promises ... and because some (especially our young people) are consumed by your wonderful style and promises for "change" like the Germans who voted for Adolf Hitler in 1932. The greed/envy by Germans in 1932 kept them from recognizing Hitler for who he was. They loved his style. Greed and envy are keeping many Americans from recognizing you ... your style has camouflaged your dishonesty .... but many of us see you for who you really are ... and we will not stop exposing who you are every day, forever if it is necessary.
Mr. Obama, you are dishonest. Anyone who votes for you is enabling dishonesty.
Mr. Obama , America cannot trust that you will put America first in your decisions about the future.
Mr. Obama, you are not the "change" that America deserves. We cannot trust you.
Mr. Obama, You are not ready and not fit to be commander-in-chief.
Mr. Obama, John McCain does not have as much money as your campaign to refute all of your false statements. And for whatever reasons, the mainstream media will not give adequate coverage or research about your lies, distortions, word parsing, bad associations, race baiting, lack of operational leadership experience, and generally dishonest character. The media is diverting our attention from your relationships and ignoring the fact that you lied about those relationships. The fact that you lied is much more important than the relationships themselves .... just like with Bill Clinton and Richard Nixon ... Monica Lewinski and Watergate were not nearly as bad as the fact that those men lied about the events ... false witness ... perjury ... your relationships and bad judgements are bad on their own .... but your lies are even worse.
Therefore, by copy of this memo, all who read this memo are asked to send it to everyone else in America before it is too late. We need to do the job that the media will not do. We need to expose your dishonesty so that every person in America understands who you really are before election day.
Mr. Obama, in a democracy, we get what we deserve. And God help America if we deserve you.
Monday, October 27, 2008
Tuesday, October 21, 2008
Sunday, October 19, 2008
Hello,Of course, I know it's merely a phishing attempt to get me to send them money, but I figured that for them to have gone to the trouble of emailing me, the least I could do is respond:
It is of utmost importance that you read this email with all carefulness and seriousness. It might interest you to know that someone who does not like your existence on Earth has paid us (Fatah Al Islam) to eliminate you. It was maintained that you have occupied a position that you ought not to have occupied, but due to your greedy nature you worked yourself up to that post. We have been following you around and from all indications you will be executed by tomorrow.
For your information, you do not need to inform anyone or even the police about this, it will never change anything, and rather you will also be endangering the lives of other members of your family.
You can always reach us on this email if you wish to make any contribution. Be warned!!!
Mustapha Mohammed Al Zawahiri.
May a pig f**k your mother and provide you with piglet brothers and sisters.I figured that provided enough motivation that hopefully they'll email me back with more stupidity.
And my a dog s**t in your mouth while you're sleeping.
Friday, October 17, 2008
Anyway, I digress.....
The premise of this is that Howard wanted to see if people were voting for the Obamessiah because they believed in his positions or whether it was because he was a Dimwitocrat or black. He took McCain's positions, proposed that the Obamessiah presented them and asked folks who they supported and if they supported the Obamessiah's supposed positions. I've always said that 80% of the people are voting completely uninformed. This definitely reinforces that supposition and perhaps makes me want to increase that estimate to 90%. You can also click here and download an MP3 version of this for sharing with "friends". If you have problems with that, send me an email and I'll get it to you (You'll have to change some things in the address, so that spammers don't harvest my address).
Thursday, October 16, 2008
Just like I said last month, the Obamessiah supporters are positioning themselves to call anyone who would oppose him a racist. This will allow them to shut up any opposition in the media or in congress. "You don't like the Obamessiah's health care proposal because you're racist".
For once I do somewhat agree with Congresscum Murtha though, although the adjective I would have used to describe his district would not have been racist. I would have chosen something more along the lines of 'unintelligent', 'retarded', 'moronic', 'heads in their ass', 'candidates for brain transplants', 'utter idiots', or some other phrase along the same lines. After all, they've elected Murtha as their Congresscum for 30-something years now, despite his inability to form a complete sentence without spewing some sort of asininity. That has to count for something.
Let's face it, Murtha will only be removed from office by these retarded inbreds if he dies there (and if there's a God, that will be soon). It's not like his stance on 'pork' in budgets will get him kicked out. This guy has never met a piece of pork he didn't like (and judging from his gut, that's literally and figuratively speaking). It won't be because of his conflict of interest, since that only counts against Republicans. I mean, if a Republican's brother lobbied for a company whose clients got over $20 million in government work, it'd be splashed on the front page of the NYSlimes and all over PMSNBC. Murtha? nah....too much work.
Friday, October 10, 2008
Ok, no, I don't wonder, I KNOW what it would be. Idiot media types, wringing their hands and shaking their heads at the general biblical ignorance of someone who would make such a statement (after of course, looking up what the word means, since the majority of them wouldn't know a bible if it hit them in the head).
Thursday, October 09, 2008
Franklin Raines, CEO Fannie Mae - There has been some question as to whether he is just an associate (kinda like Bill Ayers) or whether he's providing economic policy advice to Barack Hussein Obama, the messiah. Either way, having the guy who was actually in charge during a collapse on your staff HAS to be more serious than having some guy who lobbied congressmen.
Then there's Jim Johnson, who led the VP search for Barack Hussein Obama, the messiah, until someone brought up that there may be some controversy there. Again, the guy in charge is a lot more at fault than some lousy lobbyist who is a dime a dozen.
And now, of course, the race card. Slimy Senate leader Harry Reid tries to play it on a radio talk show host during an interview, but listen close, the talk show host will have NONE of it.
Only if your name is Barack Hussein Obama. The messiah.
And if you're a sheriff and you do this, plan on getting investigated. "Hussein 'remark'"? Really? Where do these people go to journaljism school? Idiots-r-Us?
Speaking of campaign advisors, why is it that no one on the McCain side is calling Barack Hussein Obama, the messiah, a liberal? Why is it that no one is pointing out that he was associated with ACORN, a voter registration group that is under investigation in Ohio, Missouri, and Nevada currently for voter fraud. That was one of the groups he was associated with when he was a "community organizer".
Why is no one pointing out that Barack Hussein Obama, the messiah, is encouraging his supporters to lie to people stating that they should "get in their face and if they ask about guns, tell them he supports the 2nd amendment". Bold faced lie, as Barack Hussein Obama has never met a gun-ban he didn't like. Yet, people that I KNOW own guns, hell, even collect guns, are supporting Barack Hussein Obama, the messiah,. I understand that most folks aren't 'single-issue' voters, but on an issue this important, it has to sway you one way or another.
How about the fact that Barack Hussein Obama, the messiah, is getting millions of dollars in contributions from folks named "Good Will", and "Doodad Pro"? Anyone else out there have an issue with this? How about contributions of $33,000 from palestinians in the Gaza Strip? No issue with that? I say if they love him so much, make him YOUR damn president, because he certainly won't be mine.
I don't even care that Barack Hussein Obama, the messiah, associated with a known domestic terrorist, William Ayers of Weather Underground and had no problem accepting funds from a fundraiser held by him. However, what I do have a problem with is the fact that the NYSlimes is a willing accomplice in the covering up of their association and reported that the men really weren't close. Really weren't close? A fundraiser held at his home as well as an appointment to a position where Barack Hussein Obama, the messiah, was given $100,000,000 to dole out for various left-wing educational programs definitely show that's an utter lie.
Finally, why is it that no one is reporting on the chilling effects that letters from the Barack Hussein Obama, the messiah, campaign to station managers at TV and radio stations where independent groups purchased advertising time to air anti-Obama advertising. These letters basically threaten the licensure of the stations and FCC intervention if they air these third-party ads. "Ooooh..I don't like what you say so I'm going to take away your ability to say it". And conservatives are the nazi's? "Truth Squads"? Oh for f**k's sake.
If it were a level playing field where the media just reported and voter fraud was prosecuted, I'd be perfectly fine with Barack Hussein Obama, the messiah, winning the election, because he would have done it without the propaganda of the mainstream media and fraudulent votes (as they say in Chicago, vote early, vote often). But as anyone who has been paying attention can tell you, the media has been anything but unbiased.
Wednesday, October 01, 2008
Fact - At LEAST $700 Billion (that's 12 digits folks- $700,000,000,000) will be spent to bail out banks who made loans to people and businesses that had no business getting these loans based upon their poor credit scores and poor bottom lines.
Fiction - Joe Biden came under fire during a visit to Baghdad and his helicopter was forced down by enemy fire during a visit to Afghanistan.
Fact - Hillary Clinton got major grief from Obama for exaggerating her story about landing in Bosnia under sniper fire. Joe Biden, however, has been given a complete and utter pass on his exaggerations, both of which are completely and utterly false. His helicopter was forced down in Afghanistan by weather not enemy fire. In Iraq, there was shelling, several blocks away, but Joe didn't even know it had happened until later.
Fiction - Early voting in Ohio and same day registration in other states is fully legitimate and does NOT lead to voter fraud.
Fact - I'm sure that's why Obama staffers are trolling homeless shelters and bus stations for winos they can bribe with a quart of MD 20/20 and a pack of smokes to come down to register and then vote for the big O. Fact is, in Wisconsin last election, there were a number of irregularities having to do with the election and same-day registration, including individuals who were registered to vote in Illinois who came across the border and registered to vote that day, with no proof of residence.
Fiction - Obama is the anti-christ
Fact - I am the anti-christ. Obama is just a poser, empty suit who really isn't even a very good orator if you don't give him cue cards or a speech to memorize.
Monday, September 29, 2008
Wednesday, September 24, 2008
Good to know that I'm still way ahead of the rest, even if I'm not writing for National Review!
Tuesday, September 23, 2008
Monday, September 22, 2008
Now, I fully expected that sticker to irritate some folks. I mean, let's face it, God did put me on this earth to piss people off and so far, I've far exceeded his expectations. However, I don't think I expected the type of reaction I got in a gas station in Mattawan Michigan on Saturday. I was minding my own business, putting the prerequisite $75 worth of gas in my empty tank and a guy yells from the vehicle behind me "Hey, what's that sticker supposed to mean?". Knowing that the guy either a) knew full well what it meant and wanted to be a smart ass or b) was truly a liberal and needed it explained in smaller words, I smiled kindly and said "It means that I believe that people should work for things and not have the government give them everything, unlike the majority of Democrats". He continued:
"You a Republican?"
"No sir, I just believe that people can do better for themselves than the government can do for them"
"Well, when Democrats are elected people get a fairer share of things"
"Really? Of what do we get a fairer share? Do we get to keep a 'fairer share' of our income? That's not what the facts show. The facts show that when Democrats get elected, we get to keep less of our income because they keep raising taxes."
"Well, Democrats look out for people"
"No, actually Democrats look out for themselves and try to make sure you're more reliant on the government and in turn more reliant upon them"
"Democrats try to cut our taxes and make business pay more of their fair share"
"Really, and how has that worked out for us here in Michigan? Looks like Jenny and the boys have done such a great job that we now lead the nation in unemployment."
At that point his friend, the driver, who I think was the lone braincell in the vehicle returned and made a comment I can't quite remember but essentially called his friend crazy. My wife was in my truck, saying hail mary's and hoping that I didn't walk back to the other guy's vehicle. When I got back in the truck, after filling up both my fuel and motivation to slap down more ignorant liberals, she looked at me and said:
"I'm not driving your truck ever again".
Which hey, is almost as cool as slappin down an ignorant liberal on a beautiful Saturday afternoon.
Sunday, September 21, 2008
And that doesn't even include Michelle Obama's college thesis. These people are wrong-minded. Completely.
Thursday, September 18, 2008
There have been a couple comments lately from people like the governor of Kansas, Kathy Sebelius, has said that "race may be a factor" in the election. She's basically saying that Americans are racist, or at least the Americans who are voting for John McCain and not the Obamessiah. While the McCain camp has done a tremendous job of steering VERY clear of anything that would imply that they would bring up race as a factor in this campaign, the Obamessiah's campaign has been MORE than willing to play the race card repeatedly. Sebelius is only the most recent messenger, but several have been out there trying to play on the guilt and lack of intelligence of some voters out there. "Hmm, if I support McCain, am I a closet racist?" some of your less intellectual crowd may ask. And those who have the brains full of mush (those would be your recent college students as well as the Dimwitocrat voters and 95% of Hollyweird), will think "well, this will go to show EVERYONE that I'm NOT a racist".
The problem with that argument is that, no one really f-ing cares. Seriously. No one. Not one f-ing person. Your voting for Obamessiah because you've been a closet racist all these years will NOT make up for your supporting of affirmative action because you think that at their core, minorities are just not as intelligent as whites. It will not make up for your crossing the street when you see a black man coming directly at you on the sidewalk. It will not make up for all the times when you saw a black woman with more than 4 kids and thought "probably on welfare", instead of "Catholic family". No, no amount of white guilt will be assuaged with this vote, no matter how much you think it will be.
But the Obamessiah supporters are already out there, playing this card to it's hilt, shoving the race card in front of everyone, making sure everyone knows that Obamessiah is black. And if we don't elect him, it's because we're racist and because America isn't ready for a black president. They won't acknowledge that it's because we don't believe in the direction he wants to take the country, they won't acknowlege that it's because he wants to turn us into Europe and make us subservient once again to foreign interest (as Jimmy Carter worked to do). No, it's purely racism, and America just isn't as open-minded as our European colleagues.....except that no European country has ever elected a black president, prime minister, or leader either. But that doesn't matter.
Bottom line, IF the Obamessiah loses this fall, plan on the spin to be "it's because YOU ARE racist" that he lost and America is a racist country.
Heard it here first.
Monday, September 15, 2008
Well, if that don't seal the deal for you, I sincerely hope that you get that tumor in your head checked out.
Friday, September 12, 2008
Now this brings up two things:
1. I would think that "She can suck it" from one of the biggest whores in Hollywood would be a compliment, but apparently not.
2. I'm impressed with her intellectual prowess and verbal capacity. Or....not.
Let's face it, Ms. I've had more bones in me than a graveyard isn't going to influence anyone's vote, nor is Matt "I'm the talented one, he's the pretty one" Damon going to influence anyone with more than a room temperature IQ with his "bad Disney movie" comment.
But what does this say about Dimwitocrats in general? Their overwhelming contempt for regular Americans as not being of sufficient breeding to hold high office shows that our dollars are misspent on entertainment and should be spent elsewhere. Or at least, spend them on the conservative actors that respect America and our heritage and heartland.
Of course, I'm just a midwestern guy who actually served is country in more of a military capacity and not entertainment capacity, so what the hell do I know?
Thursday, September 11, 2008
1. When a Republican says something like a candidate's "only qualification is that she hasn't had an abortion", that Republican is forced to resign through pressure via the media and Dimwitocrats constantly bemoaning the hate speech coming from 'the Right'. However, when the Dimwitocratic Chairperson of South Carolina says it about the Republican candidate, that's perfectly fine and not even mentioned on any major news outlets. Shocker.
And the media is baffled, just baffled, about recent polls that show the American people thinking they're in Barry Hussein Obama's pocket.
2. I was reminded, during his 'lipstick on a pig' comment, of Barry's response to Hillary cleaning his clock in the Philadelphia debate. He had just been busted with his comment about small town people clinging to guns and religion and was mostly on the defensive for a bit there, until the media gave him a pass. See if you can pick out Barry's clandestine sign language message to Hillary:
3. Why is it that Dimwitocrats are allowed to politicize 9/11 when it comes to their own purposes to complain about the war, complain about our defending ourselves, complain about health issues, complain about global warming, complain about the price of gas...damn near anything...but yet when a Republican who lived through and LED through 9/11 such as Rudy Giuliani merely mentions it in a speech, they're demonized by intellectual midgets such as Keith Olbermann as politicizing 9/11? Oh wait, we're just supposed to let that happen, I forgot.
Friday, September 05, 2008
However, it's nice to see that during this summer, the time that Barack Obama has been an Illinois Senator, more people have been murdered in Chicago than died in a war zone, Iraq.
Yes, I can hear you now "well, that can't be blamed on Obama", and normally I'd agree with you. US Senators really don't have any sort of influence on the local politics of a state, despite the fact that they really SHOULD. This sort of thing is where Governors and Mayors are held responsible, not US Senators. Governors and Mayors like, oh, say.....Sarah Palin. They're the folks who get grief when crime is up and the economy is down, not the US Senators, especially since those schmucks only face re-election once every 6 years, so they often miss the cycles of economics. Let's face it, in Michigan, during the last 30 years we've had the Carl Levin as our senator and has he ONCE been held responsible for the piss poor economy in the state? Not once, which explains why he's STILL in the Senate.
So when folks say that Obama has more experience because he has been a federal government official versus a local official, they have no idea what the hell they're talking about. And Obama's claim that he has more executive experience because he's running his campaign is ridiculously circuitous logic. He doesn't RUN his campaign anyway, his campaign manager and all his handlers do. Is he now taking credit for the decisions made by his campaign managers? Of course candidates take credit for things that others do, but to say that he's "running" his campaign and that gives him executive experience that qualifies him for the office he's campaigning for is just ridiculous.
Thursday, September 04, 2008
"Sarah Palin has cured my electile dysfunction".
If that doesn't say exactly what I've been feeling for the last week, I don't know what does....
Wednesday, September 03, 2008
Rudy reminded me of why it is I respect him and wish he was a lot more socially conservative. His attack-dog mentality and ability to understand and appreciate the realities of the world and the dangers that face this country really showed in his speech. Best line of the speech? "And on this side you have a candidate who has an Ivy League education and was a ....community organizer?". I liked the comment about how Osama....I mean, Obama, couldn't make up his mind for 130 votes in the state senate and instead voted "Present".
Then Sarah Palin came on and the crowd goes frickin crazy. Probably a good 2-3 minute ovation, not letting her begin her speech until about 10:30. During her speech, she reminded me why it is that I liked her back when I saw her on CSPAN about a year ago during some national governor's convention. She talked about her family, her reforms that she's implemented in the short time she's been governor including introducing competition in the utilities there and the creation of a natural gas pipeline from Alaska. Several great lines, such as "What's the difference between a hockey mom and a pitbull? Lipstick" as well as some comments about how she'd have to explain to Obama/Biden exactly what the responsibilities of a small-town mayor or governor would be. She said the job of a mayor is kind of like a community organizer...except the mayor has some responsibilities and has to answer to people. I also liked how she pointed out that he had time to write two memoirs but not enough time to write a single law. Another good line "In politics, there are some who use change to promote their careers, while there are others who use their careers to promote change".
And WOW, she is viciously hilarious.
Geraldine Ferraro, the very first woman to EVER be on a national party ticket, is the only voice I've heard in the wilderness of feminism to actually be voicing some annoyance with this sort of complaint. Other than Republicans of course, but their voices don't count in the media. Neither will Geraldine's or any other feminist who dares to voice an opposition to the mainstream media's playbook.
However, over the last presidency, we've had a VP with a lesbian daughter, fully accepted into the Republican establishment. Guess that doesn't count.
And now, we have a VP who has a daughter that is pregnant out of wedlock at 17 and the Dimwitocrats are the ones up in arms about it. Hell, they're even accusing Sarah Palin of faking her own pregnancy that resulted in the birth of her son, suggesting that her daughter actually had the baby and Palin was covering up for her. Apparently these folks have nothing else better to do than watch "Desperate Housewives" and post to the Daily Kos.
Hell, I think that the Dim's should be praising Sarah (if they want to remain intellectually honest, which we all know they couldn't do if their lives depended upon it) for vowing to support her daughter no matter what. But of course, the cries of "hypocrisy" come out.
"How can the party that teaches abstinence put a VP who has a daughter who is pregnant out of wedlock on the ticket?"..... Gee, idiot, perhaps because she's the right person for the job and we acknowledge that despite all our efforts, sometimes it fails. Unlike you folks who are completely perf...*cough* *choke*...sorry, couldn't even get that out.
Message to the Kos Kids: We're not the ones raising hell about the unwed mom, you are. We're not the ones attacking the female for being a female, you are. Perhaps, the women voters should take note and ensure that their support isn't thrown behind the same candidate that these psycho's support.